Thursday, February 14, 2013

Tuesdays with J. Alfred Prufrock



After several attempts of reading and trying to full comprehend The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock what I got was a sense of habitual carelessness of putting off important matters from Prufrock time and time again. He seems to be pushing things to last minute but in the end they will never get done. He uses the word of “time” in the on context there is still enough time to get whatever he needs to get done. For example in line 26 when he says “There will be time, there will be time” this phrase describes the overall tone of the rest of that stanza and the following because he’s implying there is always time to do something. However he doesn’t realize his body doesn’t stay the same with time limiting his abilities to get his obligations done with. To me it seems he never fully commits to the things he says he will do. He never directly asked his “over whelming question” that he talks about in stanza one and again in stanza 13 and compares the idea of asking a question to squeezing the universe into a ball which seems like an impossible task. He also says in line 37 “And indeed there will be time.” Prufrock is just giving himself an excuse that time doesn’t stop so he doesn’t need to be quick about getting his stuff done.
For those who have not read Tuesdays with Morrie. It’s about a man named Morrie who is a professor at Brandeis University who becomes ill with a neurodegenerative disease. One of his favorite pupils Mitch, also the author of the novel, discovers that his favorite professor is ill after seeing him on the television and decided to visit after sixteen years of not seeing him. Like Prufrock, Mitch would always put his work ahead of everything else and carelessly push everything else that mattered back, and not considering time of being of the essence. Mitch had a meaningless life that was revolving on issues that weren’t supposed to be that important, he went as far as to push back staring a family with his wife all because he was focused solely on his work. As Mitch visits Morrie every Tuesday till the day he dies he sees him withering away and slowly being more helpless with every passing Tuesday. He soon realizes that he still has time to priories his life and to put more important thing other than work first and to enjoy life and to accept death.
I see Morrie as how Prufrock sees himself in line 94 and 95 when he says “I am Lazarus, come back from the dead, Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all.” Because as Morrie realizes that Mitch is pushing everyone and everything else back just so he can do his job and he wants him to realize he is wasting his time doing meaningless things. Morrie gives him life lessons to so he can too look back as his life when it’s his time to go and he knows that he has lived his life to the fullest. So when Prufruck says he is “Lazarus” I sense he is saying that he wish he can also come back and redo his life and not carelessly push back important matters. An not die an old man that regretted his actions or lack there off. Prufrock is missing his own Morrie so he too can be warned about life being cut short or missing out on important events all because there seems to be time to get it all done. It’s sad that Prufrock realizes his error of his ways a little too late because by this time he’s so close to death there isn’t much he can do to change. He can only reminisce and think back on how he could have changed his life. Luckily for Mitch, he has Morrie to help guide him on the right path to find true happiness instead of pushing happiness back and other day and another.  Prufrock repeats a phrase of “would it have been worthwhile.” I can see that he is starting to realize that maybe he should have taken a chance.

3 comments:

  1. I want/need pics. First paragraph--I feel like there is a lot of deep meaning that I am not grasping in relation to the whole time bit. It sort of makes me think of everything I need to get done because time is running out for me with due dates and all. Haha, I laughes when you portrayed WMitch as a hard-working, one-track person and then said he was lazy and meaningless. It made me sad when the prof was withering away slowly. I think it is funny that Mitch is inspired to become a party-animal and slack off from work because of the dying guy. It is supposed to be the other way around, although rarely is in real life, hence the funiness/laughing at how in reality people are lazy and don't do what they should/take things the opposite way. I think it is funny whe you say that Mitch learns to accept death because he seems like a silly guy and seems even sillier when you throw in that he is also a deep guy. I love this: “I am Lazarus, come back from the dead, Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all.” It sounds like a funky rap: yo yo yo I'm ********** Lazarus ***** come back from the dead (epic)********** come back to tell y'all ****** best line of the poem because it makes the reader feel more potent emotions. I think it's sad that he realizes he lived uselessly only when he is forced too, but I think that people learn great things when they are forced to and would feel sadder for him if he was never forced to reflect on his life mistakes because living without reflection is a horrible fate I think. The best moments I think are when we are uncomfortable and perhaps dying because it would be a horrible fate to live a perfect life with no regrets, as it would make life seem less worthwhile and more robotic/lifeless/emotionless/boring and thus more painful than any other pain that life could challenge us with, even brutal torture/massacres etc. It reminds me of the Fight Club scene we just watched in class when Marla's toy tells the storeowner to become a biologist or else: "that guy will have the best breakfast he has ever had tomorrow." I am sort of annoyed that he says "I should have taken a chance" because I'm like "oh well, you didn't...why not take a chance now...oh yeah that's right...you were just saying that to be dramatic and to get other people's pity/to teach others to take chances but you are not saying that to mean yourself/you should have starred in a different book and left that line to someone who took a chance and failed/succeeded/someone who at least had the willpower to take a chance with whatever because you just make it seem less inspiring when you say that you should have taken a chance, but you don't do anything cool after you say that like try to do that walk across the room thing like that one president who couldn't use his legs." Oh wait, my bad, he says "Would it have been worthwhile." In that case, he is even a wimpier character than I thought, although I think he could be more relatable in that he is so uncertain, although I think that that book probably should have ended with him taking some sort of chance/doing something awesome and awe-inspiring, but I don't know because I didn't read that book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really liked how you were able to compare "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" to "Tuesdays with Morrie." First of all, I absolutely loved that book. It was completely and totally perfect. Second, the fact that Morrie was very happy with his life upon facing death made for a perfect contrast with Alfred, who felt exactly the opposite. Then there's also Mitch, who realized in time that he would have to change his life in order to be happy with it. If you think about it, all three of those men are perfect examples of the different way in which you can view your life. There's the two extremes, Morrie and Alfred, who are extremely happy and extremely disappointed with their lives, respectively. Then there's Mitch, who's basically in their lives. It's interesting how perfectly that works out. :) Anyways, great post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like your comparison, even though I did not read that book. But your comparison reminded me of a movie called, "The Way." I am not sure if you have seen it but, it is about a pilgrimage a son takes in France. However, he dies and his father goes on the pilgrimage instead. The father never really got along with the son because he was adventurous and did not want to be a doctor in the US like his father- so he went on an adventure to help him discover who he is. Since he dies, his father then takes that journey and although he is old and sees all the times he pushed the important things away he learns its not too late.

    ReplyDelete