Saturday, January 19, 2013

What is evil?


With the way Faust was written, we are given direct information about his life where we are also given the chance to explore limitless thoughts to what we think is the underlying message of the story, the characters, and Faust’s mission or wants in life in general. A thought we ran across in class was how closely related Faust is to the story of Job, except Faust seems to bring a not so pure evil look of the devil. From what I have known while growing up, the devil is manipulative and brings temptations that are swaying your chances of getting to heaven, but Faust gives us the idea that there is room for error, to learn from your mistakes and live in the name of God. The Devil seems to mystify the characters yet show truth in him self throughout the story. The witch didn’t know that the Devil was standing there in front of her when Faust and Mephistopheles were there. This gives thought to the fact that evil doesn’t know evil unless it is dressed or stated in an obvious manner. The essential question is, “What is evil?” Is the devil really evil? Are all his actions supposed to be bad? Did he ever purely deceive Faust without telling him what exactly he is going to do? Yes, Mephistopheles didn’t outright tell Faust his deal with God, but Mephistopheles did tell Faust all the things they were going to do and what he can do for Faust. This little scene with the witch made me question if this situation has a real evil in it in the first place. With the story of Job, you could tell the devil was doing all sorts of horrible things by taking EVERYTHING away from Job. From killing off Job’s livestock, family, and servants to giving Job physical problems like sores were all bad things that were all too horrible to live through. That shows an obvious evilness, but with Mephistopheles in Faust, he prevents Faust’s suicide, gives a more youthful look to Faust, gives him jewels to impress Gretchen, gives Faust leeway for him to get into bed with Gretchen, and some more just to satisfy Faust’s need for satisfaction. Honestly, Mephistopheles reminds me of Count Olaf from The Series of the Unfortunate Events. Count Olaf keeps reappearing in all the books under all these disguises trying to capture the Baudelaire fortune. In Faust’s case, Mephistopheles reappears as different characters such as a traveler, spirit, etc. To the Baudelaire children, it is obvious Count Olaf is after their money and keeps popping up as different characters to be their official caretaker or official “underminer” (doing different things to break the contract, make the Baudelaire children look unfit for the money, or stealing it). Mephistopheles basically tries to tempt Faust into the bad ways through lust and constant seeking for satisfaction instead of being happy with what God gave you. Faust’s wants and needs make him sway from God’s path. Anyway, Mephistopheles is direct about it and Faust has a constant feeling that he expects the devil inside of Mephistopheles. The black poodle for example, and also the fire in the tavern. Apart from Mephistopheles’s direct actions he shows to Faust, his real motive (the deal with God to test Faust) is still buried away from Faust. So from my point early on, “what is evil”, this motive Mephistopheles has makes him evil because he intentionally and purposely did all that he could to make Faust forget the way of God and stay in the lust and temptation filled life. This method proves my point that the devil had the intention to drag the man to hell (sort of) through trying to prove God wrong by making Faust do wrong. Maybe as a Catholic I may be biased, but not stating the truth and not living in the name of God by falling for temptation is wrong. The devil may have flaunted his intention by swaying Faust from the truth, but he didn’t tell Faust what his motive was. Therefore, he is evil. Evil is the devil. The lies, the negativity, the temptations, the actions against God are all what make evil as well as our sins. God sacrificed his own son for our sins, and falling into permanent temptation and lust leading to sin isn’t right. I may be saying this wrong, but from my perspective, evil is the devil, and Mephistopheles is evil in this case. 

4 comments:

  1. I think your blog was interesting and it was a thoughtful read. However, i have a few qualms. First, correct me if I am wrong but I don't see any conclusive proof that it was in fact Mephistopheles who saved Faust. Second,assuming evil defines something lacking the potential for good I would argue that Mephistopheles cannot be evil due to his reluctance to drag Gretchen with Faust. Third, can evil have a sense of humour, can evil have a sense of pity?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Faust never asked Meph whether Meph had made a wager with God, so I don't think it was considered evil that Meph didn't tell Faust. There is an old biblical saying, "Ask and you shall receive," and Faust didn't ask. I don't think Meph has to volunteer information, just like I don't think someone has to point out negativities regarding oneself or others unless they are asked to, in which case they should tell the truth. For example, one shouldn't be obligated to say, "I think you are ugly, but that's probably because I think most people are ugly" unless they are asked for their opinion. Even then, they it might be honest for them to say, "I don't think you look that bad (in comparison to some)." Also ^^ I think the book Faust could be read in several ways, and I think Goethe wanted to keep it vague because it obviously was not a straightforward read. I think the book preseumes Faust has a free will, so I will say Meph's tricky ways are neither good or bad, but they serve to reveal Faust's true character to the audience, which may include God and Meph, because why would they wager if there was certainty as to Faust's true nature? I'm not sure if this relates to the book Faust, but I think good and evil are what mortals define them to be, but I think in the book Faust, evil is the lust for power and control, as shown in part 2, and good is the lust for love and understanding. I think Meph is an Enlightenment version of the Devil, so he is more reasonable and clever than the standard notion of the Devil. I think Meph may be one of many different devils that exist, so that's why his character is different from the Devil that's pure evil.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its interesting that Meph. and Faust never discussed the circumstances leading up to Meph entering Faust's life. I wonder if, had it come up in conversation, Meph would in face be honest. Meph seemed to be relatively straight forward throughout the play. He didnt have to admit it would be difficult for him to get Gretchen for Faust, he gave up that information even though it made him seem weak.

    ReplyDelete